Zoologist
Panda (2017)
Woody Floral · 2017 · Paul Kiler
Longevity
Long
Sillage
Moderate
Occasion
Office/Daily
Seasonality
Summer
Bamboo and tea keep it cool and stalky, with orris adding a powdery softness over clean musk. Minimal and serene, it stays pale and green, a quiet everyday presence.
Taste Profile
The Natural
The Complete Picture
An accessory that's part of the package.
Everything has its place here. Every element considered, fragrance included. A complete picture is worth more than the fine print.
See your own Taste Map →How Panda (2017) smells, measured
On Zenyra's five taste axes, Panda (2017) sits temperate, built on woods and soft musk rather than amber, and carries sweetness without letting it define the scent.
Panda (2017) sits temperate, built on woods and soft musk rather than amber. That is 24th percentile for warmth across 5,322 scored fragrances.
Panda (2017) sits mid-range on projection, which for a fragrance with thin wear data reflects an absence of reports rather than a measured middle.
Panda (2017) sits mid-range on risk, neither a clear crowd-pleaser nor clearly divisive on the evidence available. That is 88th percentile for risk across 5,322 scored fragrances.
Panda (2017) sits mid-range on texture, which for a fragrance with thin wear data reflects an absence of reports rather than a measured middle. That is 86th percentile for texture across 5,322 scored fragrances.
Panda (2017) carries sweetness without letting it define the scent.
Projection, risk and texture describe how a fragrance behaves in a room and on skin. Where wear reports are thin, those scores rest near the middle by design, so a mid-range reading here is a statement about the evidence as much as about the scent. Warmth and sweetness are derived from composition and do not carry that caveat.
Rate this
More from Zoologist
Similar Profiles
Not sure if Panda (2017) is right for you?
Find fragrances like this →