
Experimental Floral
Notes checked against a published listing.
These describe how the fragrance is generally reported to behave. Skin chemistry, weather and how much you apply all change it, so your own experience may differ.
Across published reviews, most people register this first as leather.
Reviewed profile
Bright aldehydes and citrus crash into a supple leather, sharp and clean up top, warm and skin-like beneath. It reads confident and retro, a leather scent with a scrubbed, luminous opening.

The Anchor
The Dry Warmth
Warm enough to be felt. Dry enough to mean it.
The warmth here is firm. It arrives unapologetic and stays put. Substance comes first, every time.
On Zenyra's five taste axes, Tom of Finland reads warm and close to the skin, in amber and resin territory, and carries sweetness without letting it define the scent.
Reviewed profile. This profile has received a focused catalogue review.
Tom of Finland reads warm and close to the skin, in amber and resin territory. That is 85th percentile for warmth across 5,283 scored fragrances.
Tom of Finland sits mid-range on projection. That is 57th percentile for projection across 5,283 scored fragrances.
Tom of Finland sits mid-range on risk, neither a clear crowd-pleaser nor clearly divisive on the evidence available. That is 87th percentile for risk across 5,283 scored fragrances.
Tom of Finland carries some body without feeling heavy. That is 42nd percentile for texture across 5,283 scored fragrances.
Tom of Finland carries sweetness without letting it define the scent. That is 67th percentile for sweetness across 5,283 scored fragrances.
Projection, risk and texture describe how a fragrance behaves in a room and on skin. Where wear reports are thin, those scores rest near the middle by design, so a mid-range reading here is a statement about the evidence as much as about the scent. Warmth and sweetness are derived from composition and do not carry that caveat.
Find out how Tom of Finland fits your taste.
Find fragrances like this →