1932
Floral Woody · 2016
Notes carried over from an earlier source and not independently checked.
- Reported longevity
- Long
- Reported sillage
- Strong
- Typical occasion
- Romantic/Evening
- Typical season
- Winter
These describe how the fragrance is generally reported to behave. Skin chemistry, weather and how much you apply all change it, so your own experience may differ.
Modelled profile
Aldehydes and a whisper of pear open into an iris-tinged floral heart, with musk and vetiver keeping it clean underneath. Incense and vanilla add quiet depth, the whole thing soft-focus and modern.
Taste Profile
The Natural
The Complete Picture
An accessory that's part of the package.
Everything has its place here. Every element considered, fragrance included. A complete picture is worth more than the fine print.
How 1932 smells, measured
On Zenyra's five taste axes, 1932 is broadly easy to wear, familiar in its structure, and carries sweetness without letting it define the scent.
Modelled profile. This profile is derived from the evidence currently available and may be refined over time.
1932 sits temperate, built on woods and soft musk rather than amber.
1932 sits mid-range on projection. That is 20th percentile for projection across 5,283 scored fragrances.
1932 is broadly easy to wear, familiar in its structure. That is 7th percentile for risk across 5,283 scored fragrances.
1932 carries some body without feeling heavy. That is 42nd percentile for texture across 5,283 scored fragrances.
1932 carries sweetness without letting it define the scent.
Projection, risk and texture describe how a fragrance behaves in a room and on skin. Where wear reports are thin, those scores rest near the middle by design, so a mid-range reading here is a statement about the evidence as much as about the scent. Warmth and sweetness are derived from composition and do not carry that caveat.
More from Chanel
Similar Profiles
Find out how 1932 fits your taste.
Find fragrances like this →